The landscape shifts, yet the underlying requirement; checkable, canonical data; has not.
Beyond that photograph or screenshot each profile before editing; reversions do happen. Taken together, strip away the jargon and location pages are just repeated, checkable facts. Just as important, this is maintenance work, and maintenance work only fails when it stops. By contrast, most damage here is self-inflicted: mismatched opening hours introduced during a rebrand or a move.
Do not submit to a new directory until the existing ones agree. Think of local search signals as the paperwork search engines confirm before they trust a listing. The cost of contradictory data across sources is not a penalty; it is being silently ranked below someone tidier.
Resist the urge to vary the business name for keywords; consistency beats cleverness here. For local businesses, discovery still begins in a map or a directory more frequently than on a homepage.
A business rarely disappears from local results overnight; it fades as its records go dated. Silent listing decay is easy to miss because nothing visibly breaks.
The work sits awkwardly between marketing and administration, which is why it gets skipped. What follows from this is that directory submissions form the connective tissue between a website and the wider local web, and the same holds at scale.
If a listing cannot be claimed, document it and move on rather than duplicating it.
Keep the description factual; the categories carry the relevance work. Structured listings are the online records that carry the list of services for {entity_s}.
A profile can look perfect on the surface and still carry orphaned listings underneath. Prefer removing a wrong listing to leaving it half-corrected.